[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Where we stand on conformance, and how to best resolve (RE: XLIFF TC Meeting 16 Nov 2010)
Hi Bryan, all, > 1. Please take a look at my characterization of where we > stand on this issue and feel free to offer corrections or > clarifications I wouldn't say I'm against "processing conformances". Just that I don't see how that can be completely validated by a process, like a format/syntax conformance, and therefore I wonder if thse processing expectations can simply be at a different level than the OASIS-required conformances. > 2. Please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting > this week Cannot alas. > 3. Please let me know if you agree that while we can probably > move quickly to resolution - based on the ample discussion > we've had, we really need to be sure we have the three primary > position owners (Rodolfo, David, and Christian) on the call > to have a rounded representation. A quick resolution would be nice. Tend to agree that it would be nice to have Rodolfo, David and Christian on the call for a decision. Cheers, -ys
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]