[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Where we stand on conformance, and how to best resolve (RE: XLIFF TC Meeting 16 Nov 2010)
Hi Bryan, I already presented my point of view regarding the inclusion of processing expectations in the conformance clause. I personally believe we should not try to comment on application conformance. We spent too much time on this issue and there is no need to continue with the discussion. If the majority wants to include processing expectations in the conformance clause, I will not argue. Regards, Rodolfo -- Rodolfo M. Raya <rmraya@maxprograms.com> Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com From: bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com] Thanks Christian and Yves for letting me know you cannot attend on Tuesday the 16th. I wonder if we might want to postpone the conclusion of our conformance discussion to a date we know the primary participants in this topic discussion can attend. I think in looking at the minutes, primary representatives of the various points of view are: 1) Rodolfo (with support for no processing conformance from Arle, and perhaps Yves), (submitted a proposal) 2) David (with support for document and processing conformance from Bryan and perhaps Asgeir), and (submitted a proposal) 3) Christian (who defined A. Markup conformance, ranging from n-un which is "strict markup conformance", to f-e which is "basic markup conformance" B. Processing conformance, ranging from "read," "write," "read and process," "write and process") I think we would be missing an important part of the dialog without discussing Christian's "Input to discussion on Conformance" thread (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201010/msg00013.html) My request to the TC: 1. Please take a look at my characterization of where we stand on this issue and feel free to offer corrections or clarifications 2. Please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting this week 3. Please let me know if you agree that while we can probably move quickly to resolution - based on the ample discussion we've had, we really need to be sure we have the three primary position owners (Rodolfo, David, and Christian) on the call to have a rounded representation. Thanks, Bryan From: Lieske, Christian [mailto:christian.lieske@sap.com] Hi Bryan and Yves, In case there will be a meeting, I won’t be able to attend. Cheers, Christian |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]