[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Where we stand on conformance, and how to best resolve (RE: XLIFFTC Meeting 16 Nov 2010)
Thanks Christian and Yves for letting me know you cannot attend
on Tuesday the 16th. I wonder if we might want to postpone the conclusion of
our conformance discussion to a date we know the primary participants in this
topic discussion can attend. I think in looking at the minutes, primary
representatives of the various points of view are: 1) Rodolfo (with support for no processing conformance from Arle,
and perhaps Yves), (submitted a proposal) 2) David (with support for document and processing conformance
from Bryan and perhaps Asgeir), and (submitted a proposal) 3) Christian (who defined A. Markup conformance, ranging from n-un which is
"strict markup conformance", to f-e which is "basic markup
conformance" B. Processing conformance, ranging from "read,"
"write," "read and process," "write and process") I think we would be missing an important part of the dialog
without discussing Christian's "Input to discussion on Conformance"
thread (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201010/msg00013.html) My request to the TC: 1. Please take a look at my characterization of where we stand
on this issue and feel free to offer corrections or clarifications 2. Please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting this
week 3. Please let me know if you agree that while we can probably
move quickly to resolution - based on the ample discussion we've had, we really
need to be sure we have the three primary position owners (Rodolfo, David, and
Christian) on the call to have a rounded representation. Thanks, Bryan From: Lieske, Christian
[mailto:christian.lieske@sap.com] Hi Bryan and Yves, In case there will be a meeting, I
won’t be able to attend. Cheers, Christian |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]