OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: Housekeeping wiki XLIFF 2.0 Feature Tracking

Bryan, according to our process, Chair can initiate reevaluation (new ballot) of approved features that do not make reasonable progress. I believe that it covers features without owners, since these are not likely to make progress.. If someone drives them informally and they do make progress this someone should volunteer (or be volunteered :-0) as the owner..


Dr. David Filip
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
cellphone: +353-86-0222-158
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 22:02, Schnabel, Bryan S <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:



We have 1 approved feature, and 3 proposed features with no owners. Please take a look at the following and let us know if you would like to take ownership of any of these:


Approved: 1.2. Enhanced Commenting Support (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-EnhancedCommentingSupport.EnhancedCommentingSupport ) Was Magnus, then Andrew (SDL). Please let me know if you'd like to own this


Proposed: 2.2. Document-centric Localisation (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-DocumentCentricLocalisation.Document-centricLocalisation )


Proposed: 2.5 XLIFF as a Project Model (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-ProjectModel.XLIFFasaProjectModel )


Proposed: 2.10 Terminology Markup (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xliff/XLIFF2.0/FeatureTracking#XLIFF2.0.2BAC8-Feature.2BAC8-TerminologyMarkup.TerminologyMarkup )


Note was 2.10 included in another item (glossary maybe)?


David, off the top of your head, do you recall if our policy includes a contingency for approved features whose owner leaves the TC? I think if nobody claims any of the ownerless proposed features, after all this time, we can vote to strike them from the list (or move them to discarded). Approved might be more tricky.






Bryan Schnabel
Content Management Architect
Phone: 503.627.5282

Twitter RSS Facebook Tektronix Store

Tektronix Logo


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]