RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em

[Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]

To be more specific on the SLR attributes. Currently the specifications say:

On <pc> and <sc>:

- storageRestriction
- sizeRestriction
- equivStorage
- sizeInfo
- sizeInfoRef

On <ec>:

- equivStorage
- sizeInfo
- sizeInfoRef

On <mrk> and <sm>:

- storageRestriction
- sizeRestriction

On <em>:

None

Looking more closely at the definition now, I think it makes sense. But, Fredrik, it would be good if you could confirm that it is
the expected list. Thanks.

-ys


-----Original Message-----
From: Schnabel, Bryan S [mailto:bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com] 
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 10:07 AM
To: Yves Savourel; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em

I think we should take @fs and @subFs off of <ec>. Cannot comment on SLR yet.

I am working on some SLR use case and I must say I'm getting pretty excited about the module in general (sorry for this general
statement of support for SLR which does not have any bearing on this thread).
________________________________________
From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] on behalf of Yves Savourel [ysavourel@enlaso.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2013 12:54 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff] Modules attributes in ec vs em

Hi Bryan, Fredrik, all

While working on the validation I've noticed that we have the attributes for the FS and the SLR modules allowed in <sc> and <ec>,
but only in <sm> not in <em>.

Is that normal?

Cheers,
-yves



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php