RE: [xri-editors] Comments on BNF (version 03, lines 649-654)

["Wachob, Gabe" <gwachob@visa.com>]

Of course, xri:(@visa).usa/foo.bar is a BAD example...

 

xri:(http://www.visa.com).usa/foo.bar would be better

 

    -Gabe

-----Original Message-----
From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:42 PM
To: 'xri-editors@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [xri-editors] Comments on BNF (version 03, lines 649-654)

Drummond-

    I noticed that in the xri-authority production, you have URI-authority / XRI-authority / xref

 

    I'd rather see xref under XRI-authority and then also be able to have a naming authority will a normal dot-path (or colon path I spose). E.g.

 

xri:(@visa).usa/foo.bar

 

    So, I guess I'd like to see the following productions as:

 

authority-part = URI-authority / XRI-authority

XRI-authority = (gcs-char / xref) xri-segment

 

    -Gabe