[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Status of secure resolution
TC members, In my opinion, A or B are preferable, but lacking a volunteer, C is acceptable. =Loren > -----Original Message----- > From: Drummond Reed [mailto:email@example.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:32 AM > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: [xri] Status of secure resolution > > > XRI TC Members: > > As we head into final preparation of the XRI Syntax and Resolution > Specification 1.0 Committee Draft, Xavier Serret has raised > the question > that we left open at the end of our f2f last February: what is the > status of secure resolution? Are we going to: > > a) Cover it normatively in the 1.0 spec, > b) Cover it non-normatively in the 1.0 spec (say, in an appendix), > c) Cover it in a subsequent specification from the XRI TC, or > d) Leave it to the soon-to-be-proposed XDI TC? > > We need to close on this quickly so we know how we will treat > the issue > in the 08 (gold candidate) draft, so please take a moment to post your > opinion relative to the above options. > > =Drummond > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave _workgroup.php.