RE: [xri] RE: [xri-comment] XRI Resolution

["Stephenson, Marc" <marc.stephenson@tso.co.uk>]

Hi All,

I've been following the progress of XRI with much interest over the last few
months, but a comment from Loren below really caught my attention.

"The vote for 1.0 is one of the reasons we chose now to start the
implementation. [...] This makes it real enough for some to start
implementations, and anyone actively implementing will be keeping up with
suggested revisions on the TC."

Does anyone have any concrete plans to implement XRI? If so, over what
timescales? By whom? Using what technology? For what specific use? For any
organisation in particular?

Marc.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Loren West [mailto:loren.west@epokinc.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:14 AM
To:	'Wachob, Gabe'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:	[xri] RE: [xri-comment] XRI Resolution

> You make good points. The question we have to tackle now is 
> whether or not we should fix these things and have a revote. 
> I'm inclined to say we should. But that requires rev'ing the 
> spec (1.01?) and revoting. Drummond???
> 
> We can do this in very short order. I think we had hoped that 
> feedback like yours would come back before the beginning of 
> our vote, but I suspected we'd get good feedback like this 
> more than a few days after thanksgiving ;-)
> 
> 	-Gabe
> 

The vote for 1.0 is one of the reasons we chose now to start
the implementation.  My suggestion would be to go forward with
version 1.0 voting.  This makes it real enough for some to 
start implementations, and anyone actively implementing will
be keeping up with suggested revisions on the TC.

I would hope that the next version could be voted on around
the time the open source project has something running.

=Loren


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave_workgroup.php
.


**********************************************************************************
This message is sent in strict confidence for the addressee only.  It may
contain legally privileged information. The contents are not to be disclosed
to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorised recipients are requested
to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any
error in transmission.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses, however we cannot guarantee that this message
is free from such problems.
**********************************************************************************