OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ekmi message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ekmi] Minutes :: EKMI Monthly TC Meeting - August 18, 2009



Sorry for any missunderstanding. I think that Mary answered your
question clearly. The process seems reasonable to me.

Cheers,
Tomas


Benjamin Tomhave wrote:
> Tomas - you grossly misconstrue my comments, which had nothing to do
> with open-source (StrongKey is open source).
> 
> Mary can correct me if I'm wrong here, but my point was this: for KeyMG
> to have a use statement that counts toward the number of use statements
> need to move to the next phase of development, it would have to either
> be an officially supported/sanctioned work of RedHat and/or PrimeKey
> (your respective member orgs), OR it would have to be adopted by them
> into a product (open source, closed source, whatever) and then they
> would have to issue use statements on that respective product.
> 
> This point goes directly toward due process and protocol. It's not
> adequate to just go create an open-source library conforming to the
> draft standard - a member org has to issue a use statement indicating
> use of the library.
> 
> -ben
> 
> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> It is only supportive for any standard to get as many statement of usage
>> from individuals, organizations (non-profit
>> & commercial) as possible. It shows that the particular standard in
>> question is not something that has been carved
>> out for fun.
>>
>> Given this, Oasis (and rightly so) tries to ensure that the particular
>> effort becomes a public standard only after getting
>> an endorsement from 3 entities (who are contributor level or higher in
>> Oasis membership) claiming *usage* of the standard.
>> This requirement not only dispels those standards that are created with
>> a lot of vested interest but also brings credibility to
>> the standards that become Oasis Public Standard.
>>
>> My opinion.
>>
>> Tomas Gustavsson wrote:
>>> Great, that does not seem to make any difference between open or closed
>>> source software.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomas
>>>
>>>
>>> Mary McRae wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Just to clarify, statements of use must be from OASIS Organizational
>>>> Members, not 'commercial vendors'. Anyone who is an OASIS Organizational
>>>> Member (meaning not an Individual or Associate Member) can issue a
>>>> statement of use. They do not need to belong to the TC.
>>>>
>>>> A Statement of Use is defined in the TC Process as follows:
>>>> "Statement of Use", with respect to a specification, is a written
>>>> statement by an OASIS Organizational Member stating that it is
>>>> successfully using or implementing that specification in accordance with
>>>> the conformance clauses specified in Section 2.18
>>>> <http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#specQuality>, and
>>>> stating whether its use included the interoperation of multiple
>>>> independent implementations.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mary P McRae
>>>> Director, Standards Development
>>>> Technical Committee Administrator
>>>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
>>>> email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org <mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
>>>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>>>> twitter: fiberartisan  #oasisopen
>>>> phone: 1.603.232.9090
>>>>
>>>> Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 19, 2009, at 2:49 AM, Tomas Gustavsson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    
>>>>> If that is the case I think OASIS have made a huge misstake. I hope
>>>>> someone from Oasis can answer this question?
>>>>>
>>>>> Discriminating open source software certainly does not seem worthy of
>>>>> an open standardization organization.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Tomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Benjamin Tomhave wrote:
>>>>>      
>>>>>> A question on conforming implementations... don't they need to be from
>>>>>> commercial vendors to count toward the number required to move on with
>>>>>> the process?
>>>>>> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>>>>        
>>>>>>> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> EKMI TC Monthly Meeting - August 18, 2009 (Tuesday)
>>>>>>>> 10:00am CDT/11:00amEDT/8amPDT/3:00pm UTC/5:00pm Oslo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Agenda
>>>>>>>> 1. Roll Call
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Voting Members:
>>>>>>> Tomas (PrimeKey), Tim(CA) and Anil (Red Hat)   (3 out of 5) - Quorum
>>>>>>> Reached
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> 2. XSD Improvements
>>>>>>>> (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ekmi/200906/msg00014.html)
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> We will make the changes to the schema.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> 3. WSDL
>>>>>>>> (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ekmi/200906/msg00015.html)
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> We will add it to the spec.
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> 4. Discussion on Implementations
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Anil created this open source project
>>>>>>> http://keymg.codehaus.org   at the CodeHaus Foundation
>>>>>>> to create a conforming implementation.
>>>>>>> * The library will be LGPL licensed.  Both Anil and Tomas
>>>>>>> are current owners of this project.
>>>>>>> - If you want to be added to this project,  enroll at codehaus :
>>>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/signup
>>>>>>> - Then please tell us about it. We can add you to the project in a
>>>>>>> role.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> 5. Subcommittee Report
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> - Audit Guidelines SC : Put on hold as Ken Adler is unavailable
>>>>>>> (as per
>>>>>>> Ken).
>>>>>>> - Mobile SC:  Put on hold until we get the v1.0 out
>>>>>>> - TCK SC:  We will generate it as part of the aforementioned OSS
>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> 6. Other Business
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> - We will drop the idea of standardizing a Client API at this time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>>>>>>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>>>>>>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>
>>
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]