[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [election-services] Re: EML AUDIT PROGRESS (EML 510)
Neal, The other approach is using the existing RejectedVotes and UncountedVotes and the ReasonCode to track blank ballots and overvotes. DW On 11/22/2010 7:21 PM, Neal McBurnett wrote: > Our audit in Boulder has gone very nicely. My ElectionAudits software > now supports Kaplan-Markov audits with strict error bounds. I've also > collected a bunch of ideas on audit reporting from others in the US > and sent them on to Joe. > > I'm glad to see more concrete proposals for EML and P1622 from NIST > and a timeline. > > The next P1622 meeting will probably be the week of Dec 13th. > > Can we schedule an election-services meeting the week before > that, and give Joe and I more concrete incentive to get something > together for the committee? > > Note that I'm still looking for some examples of how to label blank > votes and overvotes in a 510 report via the current EML spec, which is > confusing to me in that regard. E.g. is there a way to use the > BallotStatus property in a 510? If so, if someone could just adjust > my current example to properly label them I'd apprecate it: > > http://bcn.boulder.co.us/~neal/electionaudits/eml510-example.xml > > As I indicated in my earlier comments, I expect we still need to find > a precise way to report the number of "contest ballots" in a > vote-for-more-than-one contest, but perhaps the exisitng scheme can > work for "vote for 1" contests. > > Cheers, > > Neal McBurnett http://neal.mcburnett.org/ > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:14:01PM -0500, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:12 AM, John Borras<johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >>> Hi Guys >>> >>> Now that the USA elections are out of the way, have you been able to make >>> any progress on the audit requirements for EML v6.1 please? >> I have been slammed with research this entire month and it doesn't >> look like it will get better soon. I know Neal has also been wrapped >> up in CO post-election auditing work, although he may have more time >> going forward than I do. I'll touch base with Neal soon. best, Joe >> >>> IEEE/P1622 and NIST are planning to hold a workshop in February to >>> essentially decide which standard to pursue for their solution for the >>> UOCAVA project and we will be invited to demonstrate how EML could fit the >>> bill. NIST want a P1622 draft standard to be available by June 2011 for use >>> in the next presidential elections so their work is now gaining real >>> momentum and I would want EML to be there in the forefront of it all. >>> >>> >>> >>> Do we need to have a conference call to discuss progress, issues, next steps >>> etc? >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> John > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > -- David Webber Oracle Public Sector 301-693-1000
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]