[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: HM.Requirements: HumanProof
----------------------------
Based on Sean's SW article (which was very clear and insighful), http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/ SW architecture provides us a
means to determine trust and proof of information through resources on the
Internet, through namespaces. - The Semantic Web: An Introduction However, I don't believe there is a mechanism to verify the proof of
information through human consultation. The obvious problem, as Len
brought up in previous posts, is that human beings do not have a URI...only
information associated with them does. Thus, part of HumanMarkup
specifications would have to include a manner in which human beings can be
contacted regarding verfication of a message regarding them.
Simple Example: If I am assumed/accused of being a trerrorist, I
would like the chance to _personally and immediately_ provide
evidence/proof/statements directly to the effect countering such claims.
Obviously, that would entail the message being routed to my
proximity/location/wirelessdevice.
Referesher--is it PP/CP the technology I am thinking about that might be
related, to describe the different devces that might be able to determine the
appropriate medium through which a message is sent/received by a
person? HM.Requirments: human proof
---------------
"HumanMarkup specifications could account for specifications to allow human
beings to prove data regarding themselves. "
Logistically, this would be difficult except in localized environments
anytime soon, but as a thought process I think it is important to keep in mind
in the long term.
--------------
Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC