RE: [legalxml-enotary] Re: Request to release ENML for Public Review

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Hi Arshad,

  I'm still encountering some problems and have been working with someone on
the ODF team to try to figure out what's going on. My system just downloaded
the latest Openoffice; I'm going to spend some more time on this tonight. 

Mary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arshad Noor [mailto:arshad.noor@strongauth.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:30 PM
> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> Cc: legalxml-enotary
> Subject: Re: [legalxml-enotary] Re: Request to release ENML for Public
> Review
> 
> Is this OK, Mary?  Should I upload the document as well as the
> PDF/HTML versions?
> 
> Arshad
> 
> Arshad Noor wrote:
> > Actually, all the hyperlinks are still there; I just changed the
> > colors to be black since you said the color-scheme was not right.
> > I wasn't sure what you were referring to.
> >
> > I've adjusted the graphics again, but its possible that you're
> > viewing the document with an older version of OO; I'm using 3.0.1
> > so you may want to view it in that.  Besides, I run Linux, and if
> > you're on a PC, that can also cause some viewing distortions.
> >
> > The line-numbering is gone because you said that it was not part
> > of the standard "look-and-feel".
> >
> > I added the appendices manually.
> >
> > Let me know if this is all fine before I spend time uploading
> > the documents again.  I've attached the current update.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Arshad
> >
> > Mary McRae wrote:
> >> Hi Arshad,
> >>
> >>   It appears that all the hypertext links are now gone; the date is
> still
> >> showing as today's date rather than the date the draft was approved,
> and
> >> there are graphics that drop off the pages - noticed on pgs 166 and
> >> 170 as I
> >> scrolled through; not sure if there are others.
> >>
> >>   There are also some spots in the code text where the lines wrap;
> if
> >> smaller indents were used the lines should stay in place. Otherwise
> you
> >> might want to decrease the point size.
> >>
> >>   All line numbering is now gone?
> >>
> >>   As far as the appendices I couldn't get them to show up either;
> the
> >> entries can be added manually.
> >>
> >> Mary
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Arshad Noor [mailto:arshad.noor@strongauth.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 6:34 PM
> >>> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> >>> Cc: 'legalxml-enotary'
> >>> Subject: [legalxml-enotary] Re: Request to release ENML for Public
> >>> Review
> >>>
> >>> I have addressed all comments - except for two:
> >>>
> >>> 1) I have no idea what a "namespace document" is and could not
> >>>     find a definition for it at http://docs.oasis-
> open.org/templates/
> >>>
> >>> 2) I do not know how to get the ODF to add the Appendices; I've
> >>>     tried this many different ways but have failed.  If you can
> >>>     either add them, or suggest how I may do that, it will help.
> >>>
> >>> The updated documents are at:
> >>>
> >>> ODT:
> >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31221/ENML-1.0-
> >>> Specification.odt
> >>>
> >>> PDF:
> >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31222/ENML-1.0-
> >>> Specification.pdf
> >>>
> >>> HTML:
> >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31223/ENML-1.0-
> >>> Specification.html.zip
> >>>
> >>> XSD:
> >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30239/eNotary-
> >>> DRAFT7.zip
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Arshad
> >>>
> >>> Mary McRae wrote:
> >>>> As standard procedure, before any specification can be released
> for
> >>> public
> >>>> review it is first checked for conformance against the OASIS TC
> >>> Policy,
> >>>> templates and naming guidelines. I am sending back a marked-up
> copy
> >>> of the
> >>>> specification, noting its non-conformance with OASIS templates and
> >>> policies.
> >>>> In addition, when ready for public review, a separate schema file
> >>> must be
> >>>> provided, as well as a conforming namespace document.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Mary
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Arshad Noor [mailto:arshad.noor@strongauth.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:38 PM
> >>>>> To: Mary McRae
> >>>>> Cc: legalxml-enotary
> >>>>> Subject: Request to release ENML for Public Review
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mary,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> At Mark Ladd's request, I'm sending you an e-mail pointing
> >>>>> to the various documents necessary to release the ENML 1.0
> >>>>> DRAFT Specification for Public Review.  Here are the items
> >>>>> you need for the process:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) Specification in editable format (ODF):
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-
> >>>>> enotary/document.php?document_id=30426
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2) Specification in PDF:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-
> >>>>> enotary/document.php?document_id=30427
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3) Specification in HTML:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-
> >>>>> enotary/document.php?document_id=31032
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 4) TC vote specifying this document as a Committee DRAFT:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-
> >>>>> enotary/ballot.php?id=1604
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 5) TC vote authorizing the release of this DRAFT for PR:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/legalxml-
> >>>>> enotary/ballot.php?id=1652
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please do the needful and release the document for PR. If
> >>>>> you have any technical questions about the document, please
> >>>>> don't hesitate to contact me.  Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Arshad Noor
> >>>>> StrongAuth, Inc.
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> >>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC
> that
> >>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> >>> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> >>