[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] DSIG proposal - URIs, Packages,and Namespaces - Proposal CORRECTION
The Package section 2.6 is indeed mistakable. Of course should resources within the ODF package be referable from outside. The usability of that package would be poor if this is not possible. If someone annotates parts of the package (files, XML elements) with metadata, it is desirable to refer/point directly to them. Regards, Svante Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > PS: Does anyone know if the metadata RDF proposal use of URIs also going to > be an exception to Package section 2.6? Lets not do that for any of these > borrowed standards that use URI in widely understood ways and that we have > not explicitly constrained very well. The saving grace for manifest.xml is > the use of an ODF-specific definition for the manifest:full-path attribute. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]