Re: [regrep] Summary: Implementing CCTS in Registry

[Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Other opinions?

Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> <Excerpt>
> However in this instance seems like the 'customer'
> is wanting us to say how the interface works so that
> their choosen representation has the functionality
> they need.
> </Excerpt>
> 
> David, out of our "who would create a binding" option list (reproduced
> below for reference) it appears that you favor (2), or perhaps (3) with
> the Registry TC performing most of the work.
> 
> - Joe
> 
> <List>
> (1) The CCTS Team is completely responsible for creating a registry
> binding
> (2) The Registry TC is completely responsible for creating a registry
> binding
> (3) The CCTS Team and Registry TC are both responsible for
> collaboratively creating a binding
> (4) An entirely different group (ex: a new OASIS TC) is responsible for
> creating the binding (the OASIS "ebXML Registry Bindings TC"?)
> (5) The CCTS Team is completely responsible for creating a binding, and
> the Registry TC acts in a consultant capacity
> </List>
> 
> David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> >
> > Farrukh,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is what they will accept, nor do I see
> > this as optimal.  Maybe we're thinking about the same
> > thing here...
> >
> > My take on this would be that Registry TC has to
> > pick up the ball of defining how to do this
> > conceptually.  That the Registry TC therefore
> > does that heavy lifting of defining the mechanisms
> > and available tools.
> >
> > Then the individual TC's are responsible for their
> > own representations and serializations.
> >
> > However in this instance seems like the 'customer'
> > is wanting us to say how the interface works so that
> > their choosen representation has the functionality
> > they need.
> >
> > We probably need a sub-task to define those
> > big ticket items (I think Joe had something based
> > from the CC spec' here summarized).
> >
> > So I think your 5) below is some of this - but I think
> > you are maybe pushing too much back into their
> > court of completing the whole binding...
> >
> > Or maybe I'm just drilling down into 5) here ; -)
> >
> > Thanks, DW.
> > =============================================
> > Message text written by Farrukh Najmi
> > >
> > 5) The CCTS team is completely responsible for creating a registry
> > binding and the registry TC is completely willing to act in a consulatnt
> > capacity throughout the process and review ( and even approve if called
> > upon) any resulting specs or Best Practice papers.
> > <

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano