Re: Starting an issues list?

[Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>]

> I passed it
> through the W3C online schema validator and found I got
> a few warnings because there are places where simpleContent
> is specified as having mixed content (mixed content when
> there are no child elements, I think that means).

OK, I found the causes of these 'warnings' and could correct
them easily enough but that would warrant another draft of just
the markup spec and the schema. I think it's worth this very
minor change just to avoid misunderstanding of the important
schema, even though it does not affect instances.

I'll send out new drafts of the schema and the spec in a few
hours time.

Best regards

Steve
---
Stephen D Green



On 4 February 2010 15:23, Stephen Green
<stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com> wrote:
>
> Dear TAG TC,
> I guess we will need an issues list. Any progress/thoughts
> about having and using a Jira account?
> I'm not sure how our TC comments will need to be separated
> from external/public comments. I will have a few comments
> of my own on how things might be improved after public review.
> After this month I may have to submit comments via the
> public comments list. Are we supposed to keep TC comments
> separate and try to make such comments before the review
> rather than during it?
> My comment for now is that I think there would be special
> benefit in having the schema itself reviewed. I passed it
> through the W3C online schema validator and found I got
> a few warnings because there are places where simpleContent
> is specified as having mixed content (mixed content when
> there are no child elements, I think that means). Some
> review of this and any other related schema design features
> might be warranted and might require minor changes to the
> model as well as the schema (but these should not, I hope,
> affect XML instances).
> Best regards
>
> Steve
> ---
> Stephen D Green
>