OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

tag message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [tag] Status of documents modified - Committee Draft


Ok. I can do this soon enough. I might have some
difficulty creating XHTML. For last public review we
asked Mary to do this but I'll see how I get on with
the XHTML from ODT.

Best regards

Steve
---
Stephen D Green




On 13 February 2010 20:49, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote:
> My experience is that the TC does this.  We do on the ODF and OIC TCs.  And
> we make all three versions (including the XHTML/HTML one).  All Mary does is
> review them for correctness and then copy them to the official OASIS
> directory locations(s) [unless the Chairs can do that too - I wouldn't
> know].
>
> I think for a Committee Spec that has been approved as an OASIS Standard,
> Mary might be more involved.  But I'm not even sure about that.
>
> If we want to see the Public Review start up smoothly, I recommend that we
> turn over work that is as complete as possible so that Mary's part is
> straightforward.
>
> Also, we need to provide a list of folks outside of OASIS to notify of the
> Public Review.  I don't recall whether we've created that.
>
>  - Dennis
>
> PS: I think Mary or her assistant might be more involved in some cases, such
> as for UOML-X, but if the TC is able, and we certainly are, we should do
> it.]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stephengreenubl@gmail.com [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Stephen Green
> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 12:26
> To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
> Cc: TAG TC; Jacques R. Durand
> Subject: Re: [tag] Status of documents modified - Committee Draft
>
> Yes, but I think usually OASIS staff (e.g. Mary) would
> make these changes before placing the actual CD at
> the docs.oasis-open.org/tag location (as too the PRD).
>
> I guess we now inform Mary and watch for progress to
> uploading of CD and PRD at docs.oasis-open.org then
> public review itself.
>
> Best regards
>
> Steve
> ---
> Stephen D Green
>
>
>
>
> On 13 February 2010 19:06, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
> wrote:
>> First, congratulations.  I think this is a big milestone for the TAG and
> for
>> your tremendous efforts.
>>
>> I think we've dropped a stitch though.  The [tag] groups notices that just
>> came out point to early-February versions and they don't have the
> Committee
>> Draft titles that are required.  I see that the "State" has changed but
> the
>> document hasn't.  I think you are supposed to post new versions with the
>> correct titles and cover information and have them be the Committee
> Drafts.
>> Those are the ones that you then tell Mary are available for Public
> Review.
>>
>> I suggest that we fixup the titles a little.  If we are going to use Part
>> designations, then these are all parts of the same version (think about
> it)
>> although they can be taken through editions separately.  In that case I
>> would simplify the titles this way:
>>
>> Test Assertions V1.0 Guidelines
>>
>> Committee Draft nn [Public Review]
>>
>> 12 February 2010
>>
>> (I don't recall what the pervious Committee Draft number was or whether
> you
>> want to designate it as a Public Review Draft this way as some TCs do.  I
>> don't know what to do about the nn being different here, since it matters
>> depending on how these documents are put in the official folders on the
>> OASIS site.  Mary will know if there is any difficulty],
>>
>> Also,
>>
>> Test Assertions V1.0 Part 1 - Model
>>
>> Committee Draft 01 [Public Review]
>>
>> 12 February 2010
>>
>> and
>>
>> Test Assertions V1.0 Part 2 - Markup Language (TAML 1.0)
>>
>> Committee Draft 01 [Public Review]
>>
>> 12 February 2010
>>
>>
>> For TAML there are two accompanying files and they are specific to this
> CD:
>>
>>  The Namespace Document file (which points to TAML 1.0 CD01 as its
>> authority)
>>
>>  The XML Schema which must identify itself as being part of CD01 in the
>> comment header at the beginning.  I would use
>>
>>  <!--
>>        OASIS Test Assertions v1.0 Part 2 - Markup Language (TAML 1.0)
>>        Committee Draft 1, 12 February 2010
>>        XML Schema
>>
>>        Copyright ...
>>   -->
>>
>>
>>  - Dennis
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: stephengreenubl@gmail.com [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com] On
> Behalf
>> Of Stephen Green
>> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 04:47
>> To: TAG TC
>> Subject: [tag] Status of documents modified - Committee Draft
>>
>> I just modified the status on the documents pages
>> for the recently balloted documents to denote them
>> each now as Committee Draft.
>>
>> Also updated wiki pages.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Steve
>> ---
>> Stephen D Green
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]