Re: [ubl-security] Where to go from here

[Oriol Bausą Peris <oriol@invinet.org>]

So if PRD1 does not dictate a solution, maybe we could include both approaches so that we can continue this good debate with others and finally get more "global" solution for PRD2.

I think the line started by Roberto identifying requirements and their solution is maybe the best approach to get to the simplest hence complete solution.

Best regards, 
Oriol

El 27/08/2010, a las 15:29, Jon Bosak escribió:

> G. Ken Holman wrote:
>> Thanks for the debate.  Please decide and we'll move on with
>> user testing.  We can change it all for PRD2 if you wish.
> 
> That's the key point to keep in mind here.  PRD1 is not dictating
> a solution, it's asking for testing and input.  Given the Security
> SC's decision about which method to try, we can (if you think it's
> a good idea) include the other approaches in the PRD1
> documentation so that reviewers can consider them as well.
> 
> Alternatively, we can remove XAdES from PRD1 and issue it as a
> separate draft with a request for comments.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php