Re: RE: RE: RE: [virtio-comment] RE: RE: RE: RE: [RFC] virtio-net: support access and control the member devices

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 03:44:57PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 07:26:01 +0000, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 12:24 PM
> >
> > > I know the gap. For us, the switch is under all devices(including the owner
> > > device).
> > > So we need to control the switch separately.
> > >
> > Right. Same for other devices too, including ours.
> > Hence, it is also located outside of the owner device (on a different system).
> >
> > If the switch is not a virtio device, does it really need to be exposed as virtio object?
> >
> > > In your structure, the owner device works as the switch. It has port to connect
> > > to the vf devices.
> > >
> > Right. I just put owner device as switch for simplicity of the discussion.
> >
> > At this point to have port for owner device requires creating a dedicated switching object, to be located sometimes side by side inside the owner, sometimes outside.
> > All of these cases to be crafted, please rethink if this is _really_ needed as virtio object or not.
> 
> 
> YES.
> 
> We can hear others.
> 
> @Jason @Michael
> 
> 
> Thanks


This is so abstract, hard to have any position as I'm not sure what
we are discussing. If some virtio devices have an integrated switch
then ability to control the switch through virtio seems useful.

Re:queues - it's not by chance that we have multiple admin queues.
So driver can dedicate one queue to filtering commands if
that's felt to be important.


-- 
MST