Re: file format

[Tony Graham <tgraham@mulberrytech.com>]

At 23 Jun 2000 21:46 -0300, G. Ken Holman wrote:
...
 >          but before we get into file formats we still haven't yet discussed 
 > the data flows that are up for discussion.  I think we need agreement on 
 > the approach before we spend time deciding what each of the files looks like.

1. Our deliverables don't include an "XSLT Process" (unless, like
   David, we're working on an XSLT processor).  The diagram should
   show the XSLT stylesheet that are also inputs to the XSLT
   processor/process.

2. Similarly, the "package content" should include the XSLT
   stylesheets that turn the inputs into the outputs.

3. You could put the "XSLT Processes" box on the "Users" side of the
   thick dotted line since, I believe, it the users who will be
   creating the "Configuration X" files.

4. You could use vertical ellipses to indicate that there are more
   submissions than "Submission A" and "Submission n".

5. Why is "Submission n" in italics when "Configuration X" has only
   the "X" in italics?

Regards,


Tony Graham
======================================================================
Tony Graham                            mailto:tgraham@mulberrytech.com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9632
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================