[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7
I may have misunderstood the conclusion at last week's telecon, but I thought we would get rid of the table and replace it with something like nested bullet lists, or terse prose text, or something like that -- something more verbose, in any case, that will be clear about where to look (link) for the normative presentation of the rules about the particular cases. -Lofton. At 09:30 AM 4/12/2006 +0200, Dieter Weidenbrück wrote: >Stuart, > >one comment: >The first entry in the table lists an object behavior "without picterm". >Please note that some forms of the fragment require the full fragment, >i.e. picterm.objterm. >So I suggest to change the wording of that entry to something like >"picBehavior >will be ignored". > >Also, for valid WebCGM 1.0 files as well as any cascaded multi-picture >files, >the picterm might point to another picture in the same file, which should be >legal. > >Dieter > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Galt, Stuart A [mailto:stuart.a.galt@boeing.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:14 AM > > To: CGM Open WebCGM TC > > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7 > > > > Hello, > > > > After playing with the table in 3.1.2.7 and trying all sorts > > of things made it much worse I finally began to understand it > > (I think). I left the targets of the links the same, but > > changed the callouts a bit to help if it was used in printed form. > > > > -- > > Stuart Galt > > SGML Resource Group > > stuart.a.galt@boeing.com > > (206) 544-3656 > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]