[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Quorum required for good standing; was RE: [chairs] Info for chairsetup of Kavi TC areas
I agree completely with this. This one of the two changes I was going to propose to the TC process. I had wanted to look up what Robert's says. Thank you Jon. I have been in several TC where we would NEVER have achieved quorum if we had not been ignorant of and not followed this rule. Every TC I have been has a certain number of no shows and if you can't get rid of them w/o quorum you are stuck. I think the OASIS process, regularly scheduled meetings, open archives and minutes, ability of 10% of membership to veto a Standard, has adequate safeguards to keep a small group from hijacking a TC. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Bosak [mailto:Jon.Bosak@sun.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:22 PM > To: karl.best@oasis-open.org > Cc: rphilpott@rsasecurity.com; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org; > colin.evans@intel.com; ckurt@microsoft.com; eduardo.gutentag@sun.com; > Donald.Bergeron@lexisnexis.com; leahyt@wellsfargo.com; > zagelow@us.ibm.com; higgins@kavi.com > Subject: Re: [chairs] Info for chair setup of Kavi TC areas > > > | Yes, as I said above. A person will sign up for the TC, be made a > | prospective member and assigned an Observer role, then converted > | to Member after 60 days or three meetings. (This is another reason > | that you need to keep track of meeting attendance. Only meetings > | that achieve quorum count as valid meetings, and the number of > | valid meetings is used to calculate the three meeting rule.) > > I don't think this is correct. Good standing is (or should be) > based on good-faith attempts to attend meetings. Attendance at > regularly scheduled meetings that fail to achieve a quorum should > count for this. > > Robert's says: > > ... if a quorum fails to appear at a regular or properly called > meeting, the inability to transact business does not detract > from the fact that the society's rules requiring the meeting to > be held were complied with and the meeting was convened ... > (pp. 341-342) > > I think this applies to both the three-meeting rule for > prospective members and the two-out-of-three meetings rule for > members in good standing. > > Jon > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC