Matt,
Did we mention that the cost of the tools was
deductable from Adobe's annual membership fee
and qualifies for a tax-credit as a
donation?!? ; -)
DW.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:45
PM
Subject: Re: [chairs] need your comments
on DocMgmt system requirements
Hmm...I suppose I should be suggesting a PDF based solution,
eh? I thought that would be too blatant. Of course, we have a set of tools
which could fix all of Oasis' problems, but they aint free!
Just go
down to <software retailer> and buy Adobe Framemaker 7.1. Tell them Matt
sent you, sometimes you will be given a discount :-)
-Matt
On
Feb 18, 2004, at 5:35 PM, David RR Webber wrote:
Matt,/smaller>/fontfamily> I'm
still holding out till Adobe gives all spec' editors a free copy of the/smaller>/fontfamily> full
Acrobat editor.... ; -)/smaller>/fontfamily> DW./smaller>/fontfamily> -----
Original Message -----/x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily> /x-tad-bigger>From:/x-tad-bigger>
/x-tad-bigger>Matthew
MacKenzie/x-tad-bigger>/color> /x-tad-bigger>/fontfamily>
I'd be resistant to spending
significant time and money to support more efficient MS Word authoring, when
what we need to do is come up with a better way to collaborate on documents.
I'm not entirely certain of the solution here, but I have a feeling it needs
to be based on a document standard that is not
proprietary.
___________________________/bigger>/color> Matthew
MacKenzie /bigger>Senior
Architect Intelligent Documents Business Unit Adobe Systems Canada
Inc. http://www.adobe.com/ 506
869.0949/smaller>/color>
|