Re: Code List TC URIs/URLs; was: Dissenting argument on namespace URI

["Anthony B. Coates (Miley Watts)" <abcoates@mileywatts.com>]

Related to this - when the specification and Schema go out for public  
review:

* should be Schema be 1.0, or something else to indicate its draft nature  
(the namespace URL doesn't change with the status);
* should the specification be "draft" and "1.0", or some other combination?

Thanks, Cheers, Tony.

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:50:16 +0100, Anthony B. Coates (Miley Watts)  
<abcoates@mileywatts.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:52:49 +0100, Robin Cover <robin@oasis-open.org>  
> wrote:
>
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/1.0/      NS URI
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/genericode/          RDDLs
>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/schemas/genericode/1.0/ Schemas
>
> I realise now (as I'm looking at the latest OASIS document templates)  
> that we also need a URL location for the spec itself (and perhaps the  
> requirements doc too).  I would like to suggest that the specification  
> should have a URL of the form
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/documentation/genericode/1.0/oasis-code-list-representation-genericode-1.0.*
>
> where the extension could be "odt" or "pdf" (and I could do "doc" if  
> required as well).  Any objections to this?  Thanks,
>
> Cheers, Tony.



-- 
Anthony B. Coates
Senior Partner
Miley Watts LLP
Experts In Data
+44 (79) 0543 9026
Data standards participant: ISO 20022 (ISO 15022 XML), ISO 19312,  
UN/CEFACT TMG, MDDL, FpML, UBL.
http://www.mileywatts.com/