Re: [cti] CybOX 3.0 Spec Review

["Kirillov, Ivan A." <ikirillov@mitre.org>]

Ditto – thanks for the feedback, Dave! Clearly the Email Message Object needs a bit of tweaking, but from your comments it seems like we can up with something reasonable based on the existing approach. Trey and I will figure out the best course of action for doing so, perhaps as a targeted conference call later this week.

Regards,
Ivan

On 7/25/16, 6:40 AM, "Trey Darley" <trey@kingfisherops.com> wrote:

>On 24.07.2016 11:16:26, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> 
>> I've given the Network Objects spec a pass - they're mostly minor
>> comments until we hit email, where I suspect some discussion might
>> be needed. I know a reasonable amount about email - I'm not an
>> expert, but most of my RFCs are in that space - so happy to chat
>> through these in a call if you prefer.
>> 
>
>Hi, Dave -
>
>Appreciate all the feedback! Ivan and I will review and respond to
>as many of your comments as possible today.
>
>Regarding the email object, there are a number of other people with
>expertise in the TC who contributed to the current state of
>development. Happy to schedule a call focused on polishing the email
>object, but we need to find a time that allows some of the other
>contributors to join the discussion.
>
>-- 
>Cheers,
>Trey
>++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
>Kingfisher Operations, sprl
>gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
>++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
>--
>"There are two types of people: those who fit into my taxonomy and
>those who do not." --anonymous