Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Request For Clarification: Indexterm processingin auto-index generation.
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@MenteithConsulting.com> was heard to say: > | On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +0000, email@example.com wrote: > | ... > |> Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers: > |> > |> F > |> > |> Foo, _1_, _2_ > |> > |> is misleading because readers have been conditioned to think of those as > |> page numbers. A "1" under Foo should be the same place as a "1" under > |> Bar which simply won't be the case. > | > | FWIW, I think that scheme works okay in the CSS2 index at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2/indexlist.html > > Bleh. I think it looks ridiculous. Me too? It seems to be trying to outguess the author? A little bit M$ 'ish? Peurile perhaps, rather than ridiculous Tony? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk