OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

docbook-tc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Proposed change to scheme versioning

On 25 October 2011 21:27, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
> On 25.10.2011 18:53, Hudson, Scott wrote:
>> OR should we put the version number at the beginning:
>> db-5.1-publishers-beta-01
>> db-5.1-assembly-beta-01
>> db-5.1-xinc-beta-01
>> db-5.1-core-beta-01
> I think that naming schema similar to this would be less confusing and
> it will better express that those customizations are on top of DocBook V5.1.

+1. It reads very clearly.

> I'm in favor of change in this direction. One question is still
> remaining -- what we will put into version attribute? Will we change
> pattern for version attribute or we will stick with the current state of
> affairs?

IMHO that is largely for the machine? Hence db-5.1.01 would/should suffice?


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]