Re: [docbook-tc] Proposed change to scheme versioning

[Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 25 October 2011 21:27, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
> On 25.10.2011 18:53, Hudson, Scott wrote:
>
>> OR should we put the version number at the beginning:
>>
>> db-5.1-publishers-beta-01
>> db-5.1-assembly-beta-01
>> db-5.1-xinc-beta-01
>> db-5.1-core-beta-01
>
> I think that naming schema similar to this would be less confusing and
> it will better express that those customizations are on top of DocBook V5.1.

+1. It reads very clearly.


>
> I'm in favor of change in this direction. One question is still
> remaining -- what we will put into version attribute? Will we change
> pattern for version attribute or we will stick with the current state of
> affairs?


IMHO that is largely for the machine? Hence db-5.1.01 would/should suffice?


HTH


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk