[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Stylesheet RFC -- "description" meta tag in html
/ Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> was heard to say: | > Perhaps | > | > <abstract role="htmlmeta"><simpara>...</simpara></abstract> | | I don't even know if you have to go this far. Wouldn't this require a | change to the Docbook DTD? I can't decide if this is necessary or | not. Sometimes documents may have abstracts which seem | inappropriately large for putting in a description HTML META field. Right, that's the point of the 'role'. But this wouldn't require any changes to the DTD. The 'role' attribute is a common attribute, and simpara is allowed in abstract. | You have interaction with chunking too. Sectional elements can have | abstract, can't they? so it would be nice to take the ancestor's | abstract, or fallback to <bookinfo> or whatever. Yes, it'll be a little tricky finding the "right" abstract. Cheers, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We dance around in a ring and http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | suppose, but the Secret sits in Member, DocBook Editorial Board | the middle and knows.--Robert Frost
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC