RE: [dss] Comments on version 7 of the core document

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

I am for having just one type covering CMS / PKCS#7 / TS 101 733 ... The
profile can identify any variants.

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz [mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.es]
> Sent: 04 December 2003 15:34
> To: dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [dss] Comments on version 7 of the core document
>
>
> At 13:24 03/12/2003 -0800, Trevor Perrin wrote:
> >>Request: I think that we should also provide URIs for:
> >>The signature defined in ETSI 101733, based in CMS.
> >>A PKCS#7 signature.
> >
> >I agree about adding PKCS#7.
> >
> >But isn't ETSI 101 733 just a profile of CMS or PKCS#7?  I was
> thinking we
> >should only use <SignatureType> for basic signature types, not
> for profiles
> >of these types.  Otherwise we might have to add a lot of URIs here.
> >
> >But perhaps that's what we should do.  I'm not sure.
>
> ETSI 101733 is in fact a profile of CMS not PKCS#7... and now that you
> say this... well, it is the same situation as XMLDSIG and XAdES, isn't it?
> Perhaps somebody else could give his opinion... at present, after reading
> your answer I do not have a strong opinion.... let us think....
>
> Regards
> Juan Calros
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Trevor
> >
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor
kgroup.php.