[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-cppa] RE: CPPA-BPS interlock question
Marty, I believe this issue is already included in the list of BPSS outstanding issues related to CPPA. It is stated as: BPSS timeToPerform for BusinessTransactionActivity and related CPPA: The BPSS Process Specification document has a timeToPerform attribute of the BusinessTransactionActivity element. This is the maximum allowed service time for a request, defined separately for each business transaction. However the BPSS does not define the number of retries or retry interval. One could add number of retries and retry interval to the CPP-CPA but it isn't clear that it makes sense without including retries in the BPSS choreography. It isn't clear whether the BPSS would have to be extended to cover retries or at least to include attributes that express number of retries and retry interval. If these were defined in the BPSS, then the corresponding items in the CPP-CPA would define override values. Overrides of timeToPerform and retry interval might make sense since these quantities are probably system-dependent. David Smiley -----Original Message----- From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:54 AM To: Hayes, Brian Cc: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; Hayes, Brian; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebxml-cppa] RE: CPPA-BPS interlock question Someone please add "override of value of BPSS timeToPerform" to the CPPA open issues list. Can we get this in for V 1.1? Regards, Marty **************************************************************************** ********* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com **************************************************************************** ********* "Hayes, Brian" <Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com> on 01/04/2002 10:57:28 AM To: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com, "Hayes, Brian" <Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com> cc: Subject: RE: CPPA-BPS interlock question I agree that timeToPerfom should be overridable. This is primarily a CPPA issue; obviously, the CPPA and BPSS must have the same semantics for timeToPerform. Brian -----Original Message----- From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:09 AM To: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; Brian.Hayes@commerceone.com Subject: CPPA-BPS interlock question Someone at my lab has suggested that the value of timeToPerform should be able to be overridden in the CPA. This would enable tailoring timeToPerform for the performance of different implementations. This makes sense to me. Is this alread on the interlock list? If not, can it be added? Regards, Marty **************************************************************************** ********* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com **************************************************************************** ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC