Re: [ebxml-jc] 1/12/2005: ebxml-jc Meeting Minutes 12 January 2005

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Matthew MacKenzie wrote:

> Why does SOA seem controversial? 

mm1: The comment made was that SOA may be perceived as 'owned' by 
several large companies (whose efforts are outside OASIS) who may have 
considerable weight within OASIS.

> Why would large companies want to push back?
> -Matt
>
>> ......5. Other business
>> a. ebSOA status and ebXML JC
>> Martin: What is status?
>> Breininger: There is still an ebSOA. Form new TC for higher level SOA 
>> reference model. There would be separate liaising TCs. Someone will 
>> take over as chair for ebSOA; there seems to be critical TC mass as 
>> well. Will participate in both SOA and ebSOA. Suggest collaboration 
>> between ebSOA, SOA and ebxml-jc.
>> Moberg: SOA will not document ebXML architecture. It is relevant but 
>> will not have an influence presumably. Some participants in ebSOA 
>> didn't want to be constrained to ebXML.
>> Durand: We are concerned about the direction being taken with SOA. We 
>> will participate in ebSOA.
>> Moberg: I am surprised other large companies are not pushing back on 
>> an SOA TC......
>