FYI Research (FW: [egov4dev] Analysing e-Government Failure: NewOnline Paper Compares Different Approaches)

[Colin Wallis <Colin.Wallis@dia.govt.nz>]

Greetings all

 

This from a Yahoo Group list I subscribe to.

 

Richard Heeks is a regular, if not frequent, contributor there.

 

This Yahoo group list is fairly quiet but I find useful as it comprises a number of Asia Pacific located folks (e.g. Sri Lanka), that are not members of eGov OASIS.

 

I haven't read this in detail but on a quick skim I saw some things that would resonate with this group.  

 

Cheers

Colin

 

From: Colin Wallis [mailto:colin_wallis@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 15 November 2010 11:04 a.m.
To: Colin Wallis
Subject: FW: [egov4dev] Analysing e-Government Failure: New Online Paper Compares Different Approaches

 

---

To: egov4dev@yahoogroups.com
From: richard.heeks@manchester.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:54:44 +0000
Subject: [egov4dev] Analysing e-Government Failure: New Online Paper Compares Different Approaches

 

A new paper in the i-Government Working Paper series is available at: http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/igovernment/index.htm

It compares factoral, systems and interpretive approaches to the analysis of e-government project failure. It identifies the different conceptual, methodological and epistemological foundations of each approach, and illustrates approach selection adopted in one research case study.

The paper has a linked educators' guide to facilitate its use for postgraduate and researcher training.

Richard Heeks
Director, Centre for Development Informatics
University of Manchester, UK
http://www.manchester.ac.uk/cdi

====
CAUTION:  This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you.
====