Re: [egov] Language for eGov strawman

["Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>]

The key clarification is that CAM doesn't create or dictate business rules or
semantics.   Some comments made to this list were unclear on this point.

Thanks.

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:

> Monica,
>
> I'm not sure I understand the question - help me out some more here
> please?!
>
> Also - in regard to language usage - CAM utilizes the UID mechanism
> in the ContentReference section.  Inspection of the mechanisms used will
> instruct on the abilities to handle localization and other business needs,
> and also show how CAM gets around the tag naming issues - by allowing
> people to use their own local tag names - but still tie them into a
> global dictionary - such as the UBL nouns.
>
> Hope this clarifies the reference here - I was trying to stay at a high
> level without going down into the weeds of specifics.
>
> Thanks, DW.
>
> Message text written by "Monica J. Martin"
> >
> Dave,
> Forgive the question - Isn't CAM the mechanism for assembly based on
> business
> rules and semantics only and not responsible for capture / creation /
> packaging of those business rules and semantics?
> <


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>










Received: (qmail 28039 invoked by uid 60881); 19 Mar 2003 23:22:42 -0000
Received: from Jon.Bosak@sun.com by hermes by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.15 
 (spamassassin: 2.43.  Clear:SA:0(0.8/8.0):. 
 Processed in 0.203314 secs); 19 Mar 2003 23:22:42 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=8.0
Received: from unknown (HELO pheriche.sun.com) (192.18.98.34)
  by mail.oasis-open.org with SMTP; 19 Mar 2003 23:22:42 -0000
Received: from hsoak01a.SFBay.Sun.COM ([129.149.70.1])
	by pheriche.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19943;
	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:30:30 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from bosak@localhost)
	by hsoak01a.SFBay.Sun.COM (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.2) id h2JNU8c04122;
	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:30:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:30:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Jon Bosak <Jon.Bosak@sun.com>
Message-Id: <200303192330.h2JNU8c04122@hsoak01a.SFBay.Sun.COM>
To: egov-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
cc: egov@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: ebXML eGov pilot
Reply-to: jon.bosak@sun.com

[This is a repeat of a message to egov-ws that appears to have
bounced.  I am attempting to include egov this time around because
it occurs to me that this might be interesting to people outside
of the egov-ws subcommittee.]

I earlier agreed with Graham Beaver that a primary deliverable of
this group should be "worked scenarios" for ebXML in eGov.  In
fact, I'd like to go further and say that this group should serve
as a focus for ebXML eGov prototypes.  Here's a presentation
showing an example of what I'd like to see happen (all files are
the same content, just different formats):

   http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/

Jon










Received: (qmail 29136 invoked by uid 60881); 20 Mar 2003 14:19:39 -0000
Received: from david.layton@gsa.gov by hermes by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.15 
 (spamassassin: 2.43.  Clear:SA:0(2.1/8.0):. 
 Processed in 0.195764 secs); 20 Mar 2003 14:19:39 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=8.0
Received: from unknown (HELO scog-ws3.gsa.gov) (159.142.144.58)
  by mail.oasis-open.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2003 14:19:39 -0000
Received: from 159.142.144.55 by scog-ws3.gsa.gov with ESMTP (GSA
 Internet E-Mail System (MMS v5.5.0)); Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:27:23 -0400
Subject: RE: [egov] Interoperable Services SC Info
To: jim.rice@amberpoint.com
cc: egov@lists.oasis-open.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8  June 18, 2001
Message-ID: <OFAA610923.C79CB811-ON85256CEF.004ED4DD@gsa.gov>
From: david.layton@gsa.gov
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:27:21 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SCOG-NOTESSMTP1/GSAEXTERNAL(Release
 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 03/20/2003 09:27:23 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 1267104152750-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Jim,

Agreed - see my recent response to Jon Bosak et al regarding the scheduling
of the SC meeting in London.  I do not have a date/time for the SC meeting
at this point, but am working to identify one.  Stay tuned for details ...

David


                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                    
                    "Jim Rice"            To:     david.layton@gsa.gov, egov@lists.oasis-open.org                   
                    <jim.rice@amber       cc:                                                                       
                    point.com>            Subject:     RE: [egov] Interoperable Services SC Info                    
                                                                                                                    
                    03/18/2003                                                                                      
                    02:15 PM