[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [egov] UN XML project gains Microsoft support
Paul Spencer wrote: >David, > >I had not realised at the egov TC meeting that you were not aware of this. I >had assumed that there was some coordination and that UN/CEFACT would >replace its format with the (rather better in my opinion) UBL format. I >should never assume! > > Hi Paul, Th ebXML Registry CC Review SC <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/regrep-cc-review> within ebXML Registry in cooperation with the CCTS team is defining a binding from CCTS specification to ebXML Registry to provide a CC relaization based upon ebXML Registry Information Model (ebRIM). UBL code lists build upon the CCTS codes. Recently the UBL TC agreed to consider using the OASIS ebXML Registry Information Model (ebRIM) ClassificationScheme format as a format for UBL code lists representation. Some of the reasons why the ebRIM ClassificationScheme format is useful are: -It is extensible and can handle current and future requirements for mapping UBL code lists -It Enables hierarchical code lists (as in UN/eDocs LoCode, Argentinian currency use cases) -It provides one common XML schema may be used to represent any code lists -It makes it easier to manage UBL code lists in an ebXML Registry enabling automatic content specific cataloging and content specific semantic validation. While it will take some time for the dust to settle, a desirable outcome could well be that CCTS uses ebRIM to define its serialization format, UBL uses Core Components BIEs and therefor indirectly uses ebRIM format as the picture below shows: |--------------------------------------------------------------| | UBL Business Documents | |--------------------------------------------------------------| | Core Component BIE | |--------------------------------------------------------------| | ebXML Registry Information Model (ebRIM) | |--------------------------------------------------------------| -- Regards, Farrukh > >As part of a project, I have written stylesheets to translate several of the >UN/CEFACT codelists into the draft UBL format with my proposed xs:appinfo >extensions. This is not difficult, but if anyone wants them, I will make >them available. > >Regards > >Paul Spencer >Boynings Consulting Ltd >http://www.boynings.co.uk > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] >>Sent: 17 May 2003 15:32 >>To: OASIS eGov list; Klaus-Dieter Naujok >>Subject: [egov] UN XML project gains Microsoft support >> >> >>Team, >> >>Someone asked about codelists in our meeting in London >>and we had some discussion around the OASIS Registry >>SC on Representations in XML. >> >>This URL: >> >> http://www.unece.org/etrades/unedocs/codelist.htm >> >>has details on the UNECE work on this. It's troubling >>that CEFACT is not coordinating this back thru into >>the ebXML work inside OASIS - but at least we've managed >>to make the connection now - via an "interrupt" jump! >> >>Anyway - I'll undertake to bring this to the attention of >>the OASIS Registry SC that is reviewing CCTS representation, >>as clearly some level of compatibility here would be >>constructive. >> >>Thanks, DW. >> >>-------------Forwarded Message----------------- >> >>From: "XMLEDI Group", INTERNET:xmledi-group@listman.disa.org >>To: "XMLEDI Group", INTERNET:xmledi-group@listman.disa.org >> >>Date: 5/17/2003 10:04 AM >> >>RE: UN XML project gains Microsoft support >> >> >>How does this match the ISO work or X12 efforts or OASIS UBL >>initiative? Or >>is it apples and pears? >> >>Any insight here would be great. >> >>- Bruce >> >>---------------------- >>A United Nations project using XML (Extensible Markup Language) to give >>small and medium-sized companies an alternative to paper forms when doing >>business across borders has won support from Microsoft. Microsoft >>demonstrated how UNeDocs, the product of the XML project, would work with >>its InfoPath application. Details of the prototype InfoPath implementation >>will be released within 30 days. >>http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp?liArticleID=121 >> >> >845&liFlavourID=1&sp=1 > > > > >----------------------- Internet Header -------------------------------- >Sender: bounce-xmledi-group-13803@listman.disa.org >Received: from [66.160.74.194] ([66.160.74.194]) > by siaag2aa.compuserve.com (8.12.9/8.12.7/SUN-2.7) with ESMTP id >h4HE4C0p015870 > for <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>; Sat, 17 May 2003 10:04:12 -0400 (EDT) >Received: from no.name.available by [66.160.74.194] > via smtpd (for siaag2aa.compuserve.com [149.174.40.131]) with >ESMTP; Sat, 17 May 2003 10:03:00 -0400 >Received: from ([10.0.0.11]) by disa-relay.disa.org with Microsoft >SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); > Sat, 17 May 2003 10:02:14 -0400 >Message-ID: ><LYRIS-13803-31131-2003.05.17-10.01.23--Gnosis_#compuserve.com@listman.disa. >org> >From: "Bruce Peat" <BPeat@eProcessSolutions.com> >To: "XMLEDI Group" <xmledi-group@listman.disa.org> >Subject: UN XML project gains Microsoft support >Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:01:32 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C31C5B.4B018BA0" >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:leave-xmledi-group-13803Q@listman.disa.org> >Reply-To: "XMLEDI Group" <xmledi-group@listman.disa.org> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 May 2003 14:02:14.0898 (UTC) >FILETIME=[EB7EBD20:01C31C7C] > > > > -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]