OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

egov message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: e-NOTARIZATION STANDARDS


Christal,

 

As per the previous replies to this message suggest there are many standards covering the technical aspects of security, electronic signatures, electronic seals, public key technology, etc.  But I believe the question you are raising relates specifically to e-Notarization and concern how to determine the integrity and reliability of a signature on a transaction.  In which case I would recommend you look at the following OASIS DSS FAQ and see if it covers the eNotary scenario you have in mind.

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dss/faq.php

 

If you need any further information on the standards in this area please let me know. My colleague Nick Pope and I have been actively involved in standards in this area for over 20 years and a major contributor to the European Electronic Signature Standardisation Initiative (EESSI) work in ETSI, CEN and now OASIS. I can probably point you to the required information.

 

Regards

 

John Ross

 

-----Original Message-----
From: john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk [mailto:john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 05 September 2003 09:47
To: egov@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [egov] RE: e-NOTARIZATION STANDARDS

 


Does anyone know of any work in relation to this topic please?

John

----- Forwarded by John Borras/e-Envoy/CabinetOffice on 05/09/2003 09:44 -----

 

"Pike-Nase, Christal" <cpikenase@state.pa.us>

04/08/2003 16:27

       
        To:        "'john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk'" <john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk>
        cc:        
        Subject:        RE: e-NOTARIZATION STANDARDS




Dear Mr. Borras:
Thanks so much for your email message.  The standards we are seeking concern how to determine the integrity and reliability of a signature certification authority.  If anyone within your organization or one of your contacts has developed such standards we would be very interested in obtaining a copy of them. Thanks again.
Sincerely yours,
Christal Pike-Nase
-----Original Message-----
From:
john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk [mailto:john.borras@e-envoy.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent:
Monday, August 04, 2003 4:00 AM
To:
cpikenase@state.pa.us
Subject:
e-NOTORISATION STANDARDS


Christal


It was good to meet you, if only very briefly, in Portland.  You asked about standards work for e-notorisation.   As far as I can tell nobody in OASIS is currently working on this, but if you would like to give me a brief overview of the current problems as you see them and the need for such standards,  I'll feed it into my e-governemnt technical committee and see what we can do about agreeing a standard.  


I'm not sure I can guarantee an immediate solution as this will have to compete with many other similar requests but  I'll do my best to get it up our agenda quickly.


Regards,

John Borras
Assistant Director
Office of e-Envoy
Cabinet Office
UK

Tel  +44 207 276 3101


PLEASE NOTE: THE ABOVE MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET.

On entering the GSI, this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet (GSI) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.

GSI users see http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/notices/information/gsi-003-2002.pdf for further details. In case of problems, please call your organisational IT helpdesk.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]