[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: Update: Re: [emergency] FW: IPAWS Profile Discrepancy
That's my recollection, too, Gary, Cheers, Rex Gary Ham wrote: > If I am not mistaken, we explicitly chose not to create a IPAWS > profile schema separate from CAP 1.2. Reaso ing was that most of the > IPAWS rules could not be enforced by schema anyway. They are primarily > content as opposed to structure rules. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 10, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Jacob Westfall<jake@jpw.biz> wrote: > >>> Since when did the profile schema disappear? (Apparently, it >>> disappeared right after PR02. Maybe the better question is why did it >>> disappear so silently and no one update the definition of "Profile" in >>> the document?) >> >> The Public Review 01 and 02 documents for the IPAWS Profile do not >> state that an applicable Profile Schema is available nor required. >> PR02 went out with a sample CAP 1.2 schema, which was not yet a >> published standard, reflecting the state of 1.2 at that time, in >> order to illustrate the Profile's change from CAP 1.1 to 1.2 as the >> base. Ideally 1.2 would have already been approved and the >> profile/cart wouldn't have come before the 1.2/horse. Unfortunately >> thats the situation we're in and if this caused any confusion it's >> regrettable. The joys of being an early adopter... >> >> In section 1.3 Terminology, I don't think the definition of Profile >> needs to be updated today as its pretty clear. Its a generic >> description of a Profile, which may or may not, have its own schema. >> If there was a schema created, then this definition illustrates how >> it should relate to the original, but doesn't state that one has been >> created officially for this particular profile. There is the option >> of someone creating their own unofficial schema that incorporates >> some of the profile's restrictions as long as it follows these >> guidelines. As more profiles are created, this definition could >> certainly be revisited. >> >> The key section is 3.2 Conformance which says a profile message must >> be valid according to CAP 1.2 and the additional requirements in >> Section 2 of the Profile. >> >> -- >> jake@jpw.biz >> -- >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]