[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-677) Actor vs Party
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80650#comment-80650 ] William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-677: ------------------------------------------- Actor conversation needs to be done clearly and once. (Introductory chapter needs improvement) "Market" acts as a party; bilateral transactions against that market party seems fundamental. Party may act as buy or seller - section 2? - perhaps that discussion goes there. Actor takes on ROLE of a PARTY, not "is a Party". > Actor vs Party > -------------- > > Key: ENERGYINTEROP-677 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-677 > Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cts > Affects Versions: CTSPR01 > Environment: Edward G. Cazalet, TEMIX https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00001/Cazalet_Comments_on_CTS.pdf > Reporter: Toby Considine > Assignee: Toby Considine > Priority: Major > Labels: ARCH-CONF, CLARITY > > 1. The Proposal introduces Actor as a synonym with Party. There is no apparent advantage to the change. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]