Re: [office-accessibility] Draft agenda for Thursday

[Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>]

Hi Rich,
>
> Also, we need to get the members of the disability community on board. 
> Peter, I am working to get Raman on board. Would you work with Yanina 
> or her delegate to get on board please? That PDF form is frustrating 
> because it requires a signature as well.
>
I've already sent a note to both Janina (note spelling) and also Jerry 
Berrier.  When I spoke with both of them a couple of weeks ago neither 
was aware that they ball was in their court to move forward. 

Nat - according to the webpage 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office-accessibility/event.php?event_id=10638 
the information about the meeting is public.  Any reason Janina and 
Jerry (and Raman) can't just call in and participate?  They wouldn't 
have formal status, but we can give full deference to their comments.


Peter
>
>
> Rich
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Emerging Technologies
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441
> schwer@us.ibm.com, Phone: 512-838-4593,T/L: 678-4593, mobile: 512-876-9689
>
> "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -
> I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the 
> difference.", Frost
>
> Inactive hide details for Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>Peter Korn 
> <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>
>
>
>                         *Peter Korn <Peter.Korn@Sun.COM>*
>
>                         01/24/2006 01:20 PM
>
> 	
>
> To
> 	
> Nathaniel S Borenstein/Concord/IBM@IBMUS
>
> cc
> 	
> office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org
>
> Subject
> 	
> Re: [office-accessibility] Draft agenda for Thursday
>
> 	
>
>
> Hi Nat, gang,
>
> I think this is a good agenda.  I would insert something between I and
> II -> some introduction of what ODF is and is not, and discussion of the
> scope of our work.  Especially if we have folks from the disability
> community who aren't steeped in technology on board at this point, I
> think this sort of preparatory work would be important (and to solicit
> at least discussion on the scope part).  And speaking of that, who do we
> have at this point?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
> > With lots of input from Rich Schwerdtfeger, here's a proposed agenda
> > for Thursday's call.  Comments welcome!
> >
> > I.  Introductions
> > II.  Goals/requirements
> >         -- to match MS Office accessibility
> >         -- to surpass MS Office accessibility
> > III.  Time frame (deadlines)
> > IV.  Document editor(s) (seeking volunteers)
> > V.  Who else should we get to join?
> > VI.  Use cases, esp. for presentations
> > VII.  XForms accessibility issues
> >
> > Let me know if you have any suggested changes.  -- Nathaniel
>
>