[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [office-metadata] Reuse of metadata proposal for nonODF applications]
Svante Schubert wrote: > Nevertheless it seems the odf:Field is just semantic sugar, but not > really necessary, as the relation to the text:meta-field is made by the > [uri]. Are you listening to me Svante? > It seems even better to use <citation:Field> instead of the <odf:Field> > to define a citation:prefix and suffix as it is not clear that all > text:meta-field would use this prefix/suffix mechanism as it is > currently not defined in ODF. Are you saying NO field is going to use it? This is getting ridiculous. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]