Re: [Fwd: Re: [office-metadata] Reuse of metadata proposal for nonODF applications]

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

Svante Schubert wrote:

> Nevertheless it seems the odf:Field is just semantic sugar, but not 
> really necessary, as the relation to the text:meta-field is made by the 
> [uri].

Are you listening to me Svante?

> It seems even better to use <citation:Field> instead of the <odf:Field> 
> to define a citation:prefix and suffix as it is not clear that all 
> text:meta-field would use this prefix/suffix mechanism as it is 
> currently not defined in ODF.

Are you saying NO field is going to use it?

This is getting ridiculous.

Bruce