[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Errata: Substantive Schema Change in 15.27.22?
Dennis, On 09/22/08 07:05, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > With regard to 2008-09-22 agenda item 4b, I notice that a change to the ODF schema is technically a substantive change. I am sure this has been talked through before, and I apologize for bringing it up again except I am expected to deal with agenda item 4b, which is an attestation that there are no substantive changes. > > What I'm looking at is the change in 15.27.22 p.651 line 31 where the attribute name style:wrap-dynamic-treshold is changed to style:wrap-dynamic-threshold (adding an h after the t in treshold). > > OBSERVATIONS > > 1. I understand that this was unintended and that the change is to the spelling that is used in the prose that describes the attribute. In prose, that would clearly be a typo. In a schema, it is a different matter (even though a mistake). > > 2. I also see that the ODF 1.1 schema has style:wrap-dynamic-threshold. > > 3. The only ODF 1.0 schema supplied on the OASIS TC page still has style:wrap-dynamic-threshold. > > 4. In particular, there does not seem to be a separate schema file available for ODF 1.0 (Second Edition) cs1. The public downloads for ISO/IEC 26300:2006 do not provide a schema file at all. > > QUESTIONS > > 1. So is this considered non-substantive even though it is significant as schema text, or should we maybe pull that one errata item out and think about it. That's an interesting question. The description of the attribute says "style:wrap-dynamic-threshold" while the schema says "style:wrap-dynamic-treshold". That's an obvious mismatch. Only one of the two spellings can be "correct" in the sense that this is the name that should be used in ODF documents. The question is what implementors have assumed to be correct and what they therefore have implemented. Since there is an obvious spelling error in the schema, my assumption would be that they have used "style:wrap-dynamic-threshold" an in fact have assumed that the schema is wrong here. Under this assumption, correcting the spelling in the schema would be non-substantive. > > 2. If the change is to be kept, what do we do about the schema files? We may update them. Michael > > > - Dennis > > Dennis E. Hamilton > ------------------ > NuovoDoc: Design for Document System Interoperability > mailto:Dennis.Hamilton@acm.org | gsm:+1-206.779.9430 > http://NuovoDoc.com http://ODMA.info/dev/ http://nfoWorks.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]