[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
On Monday 09 February 2009, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > That means, even if you take the strict conformance definition that does > not allow foreign elements and attributes, you can add as many namespace > declaration as you want, and you can use them in as many attribute > values as you want. This is a rather strange notion of strict conformance, isn't it? <ooo:foo><text:p>hello</text:p></ooo:foo> in not allowed, but <style:paragraph-properties fo:text-align="ooo:magic-alignment"> would be allowed, even though no other implementation can understand what this means? This could be fun... fo:background-color="ooo:fancy" fo:border="ooo:hexagonal" fo:margin-bottom="ooo:not too big please" fo:padding="ooo:better have some" style:wrap="ooo:chicken curry" -- David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Qt Software @ Nokia to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]