OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [office] Comments on draft response


Michael,

I'm not sure I understand this question:

"But if we [state the errata against the ODF 1.0 OASIS standard], where is
the difference between informally listing page and line numbers, which may
refer to a text that differs between ODF 1.0 and ISO 26300, and listing the
differing text itself?"

I think there is probably no difference, but I want to make sure I
understand the case you have in mind.  Can you provide an example where this
is the case?

 - Dennis

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200908/msg00147.html
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 00:10
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: robert_weir@us.ibm.com; office@lists.oasis-open.org; Patrick Durusau
Subject: Re: [office] Comments on draft response

Hi Dennis,

On 08/11/09 18:47, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> When we developed what is now Errata 01, I recall being told that we can
> only issue OASIS-published errata for approved OASIS Standards.  That is
why
> Errata 01 consists of Errata for the OASIS ODF 1.0 Standard, and neither
IS
> 26300 nor ODF 1.0 2nd edition, which are not OASIS Standards.  (It is my
> understanding that the mapping to IS 25300/ODF 1.0 2e, and the mapping to
> defect-report items, was done as a courtesy but it is not the material
> content of the errata document, despite how much that is all that matters
to
> SC34.)  If my understanding of this is correct, I would like to know what
> has changed since October 2008.

Nothing has changed since when. But I'd like to clarify that the errata 
of cause must not normatively list text from ODF 1.0 2nd edition, but 
from the ODF 1.0 OASIS standard. That needs to be changed in the current 
draft before we can approve it as an errata.

But if we do so, where is the difference between informally listing page 
and line numbers, which may refer to a text that differs between ODF 1.0 
and ISO 26300, and listing the differing text itself?

[ ... ]



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]