oiic-formation-discuss message

Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language

From: "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
To: oiic-formation-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:02:10 +0100

2008/6/11 Matthew Reingold <matthewreingold@gmail.com>:
> English sounds good.
>
> Anticipated users...umm, can we revisit this tomorrow in case someone comes
> up with anything else?
>
> I was going to say maybe individuals who handle archiving/bookkeepers, as
> well? Off the top of my head I can't come up with a better phrase other than
> "everyone that uses a computer".


Just variants on 'users'?

+1 to proposal.

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

References:
- What are we validating and why?
  - From: "David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>
- (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
  - From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate.
  - From: Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
  - From: "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com>
- (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
  - From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
  - From: "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net>
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
  - From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
  - From: "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net>
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
  - From: "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net>
- Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
  - From: "Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com>