[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
Robert, and Dave:
Is this something that needs to be decided by the as-yet-non-existent TC, or is it something that should be defined before the TC convenes its first meeting?
I am inclined to believe that the TC would make such decisions as a first order of business, unless [we] choose to limit their scope in the beginning by saying "Disregard all versions of the ODF prior to x.x". I think, though, that this is splitting too many hairs this early in the game. Of course, I could be wrong there.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dave.pawson@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:33 PM
To: oiic-formation-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
2008/6/16 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>:
>
> The requirement to indicate a definitive version of the standard is a new
> OASIS requirement that has been added since ODF 1.1 was approved. So you
> will not find a single one of the 1.1 files officially designated as
> "definitive".
Thanks. Probably why they contradict one another then.
Para 1.3, namespaces.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: oiic-formation-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: oiic-formation-discuss-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]