RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?

["Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us>]

Robert, and Dave:

Is this something that needs to be decided by the as-yet-non-existent TC, or is it something that should be defined before the TC convenes its first meeting?

I am inclined to believe that the TC would make such decisions as a first order of business, unless [we] choose to limit their scope in the beginning by saying "Disregard all versions of the ODF prior to x.x".  I think, though, that this is splitting too many hairs this early in the game.  Of course, I could be wrong there.

Garry L. Hurley Jr.
Application Developer 2
Office of Information Technology - Bureau of Application Development
PA Department of Labor & Industry
651 Boas Street, Harrisburg, PA 17121 
Phone: 717.506.9373 (UCMS) or 717.346.9799 (Harrisburg)  Fax: 717.506.0798  Mobile: 717.649.0597
www.dli.state.pa.us <http://www.dli.state.pa.us>


My comments do not reflect those of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, its various agencies and departments, or its citizens.  They are my own, and may or may not be shared by those in positions of authority over me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dave.pawson@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:33 PM
To: oiic-formation-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?


2008/6/16  <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>:
>
> The requirement to indicate a definitive version of the standard is a new
> OASIS requirement that has been added since ODF 1.1 was approved. So you
> will not find a single one of the 1.1 files officially designated as
> "definitive".

Thanks. Probably why they contradict one another then.

Para 1.3, namespaces.

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: oiic-formation-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: oiic-formation-discuss-help@lists.oasis-open.org