Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

2008/6/17  <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>:
>
> "Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> wrote on 06/16/2008
> 07:50:54 PM:
>
>> Robert, and Dave:
>>
>> Is this something that needs to be decided by the as-yet-non-
>> existent TC, or is it something that should be defined before the TC
>> convenes its first meeting?
>>
>
> I'd resist the urge putting charter requirements at this level of detail.
>  If we say nothing on the subject, then the TC can explore alternatives and
> make the most appropriate choice.  They can also try it one way and then
> reverse direction.  But items in the charter are fixed.


Equally the TC could ignore it. If the charter says 'address X'
they can include it, consider and reject it or make it
a central theme.

Say nothing and you're hoping. No more.

-1 Rob.

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk