[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
2008/7/14 Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be>: > Radoslav Dejanović wrote: >> I believe that is the point - we do not want applications to do any >> internal modifications of a document unless the user adds, modifies or >> deletes something. Input file should be exactly the same as the output >> file if there were no user interactions (we should consider spell >> checking as user interaction). > So, basically: > "when an application doesn't support an elements or an attribute that is > part of the ODF namespaces (or any namespace ?), the application shall > not change or remove said element or attribute (unless the parent is > changed or removed ?)" > So if app X opens an ODT with tables and X doesn't support tables, that > would be OK as long as X isn't removing the tables when saving the > document to a file. Part of the ODF namespace as per the spec (whichever spec that is), I'd suggest. As I've noted before here, random third-party extension preservation has led to interoperability disasters in the past with ISO specs. - d.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]