openc2-lang message

Subject: Re: [openc2-lang] RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender

From: Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com>
To: "Mathews, Mary L" <mlmathe@radium.ncsc.mil>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:07:41 +0000

On 26.01.2018 21:09:48, Mathews, Mary L wrote:
> I also want to echo the point made by Duncan earlier that OpenC2 is
> a language, not a protocol.
> 

Given that the majority of computer languages are versioned, this line
of argument strikes me as specious, at best.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache
invalidation and naming things." --Phil Karlton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

References:
- We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender
  - From: <duncan@sfractal.com>
- Re: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender
  - From: Danny Martinez <danny.martinez@g2-inc.com>
- RE: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender
  - From: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
- RE: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender
  - From: "Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>
- RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [openc2-lang] We need your input on: mandatory vs optional, Header, id, version, timestamp, sender
  - From: "Mathews, Mary L" <mlmathe@radium.ncsc.mil>