Re: Proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Dan,

This work item was sanctioned early on when we discussed work items for V2.0. We had discussed earlier in a
RAWS meeting that we will include this item in the RAWS team as it is related to web services.

I do not believe that our progress should be hindered by what is going on in UDDI. The UDDI team is
constantly making changes in each release that duplicates ebXMl functionality. I cannot even discuss
specific instances as it is private to the UDDI AG. On the other hand every thing in this TC is open for
duplication.

I feel that there is a string need for us to support the capabilities outlined by Sanjay and they fit well
with focus on web services in this team. Please, lets focus on the merits of the proposal instead.

Dan Chang wrote:

> Sanjay,
>
> I am concerned that in doing so we will explicitly overlap and repeat what
> has been done in UDDI. I believe we ought to first resolve the issue on
> positioning OASIS/ebXML Registry with UDDI, as suggested by Scott.
>
> Regards,  Dan
>
> Metadata Management Technology and Standard
> IBM DBTI for e-Business
> Notes:     Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS
> Internet:  dtchang@us.ibm.com
> VM:          IBMUSM50(DTCHANG)
> Phone:    (408)-463-2319
>
>
>                     "Patil,
>                     Sanjay"              To:     "'regrep-raws@lists.oasis-open.org'"
>                     <SPatil@iona.c        <regrep-raws@lists.oasis-open.org>
>                     om>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding
>                     09/04/01 03:05
>                     PM
>
>
>
> Here is a proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding objects
> as first class object in the RIM.
>  <<SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc>>
>
> In order to be readily useful, a registry needs to have inherent support
> for
> the commonly used business documents. Business Service interface and the
> technical binding of these Business Service interfaces seem to be falling
> in
> such a category.
>
>            1.        Providing inherent support for common business
> documents.
>            2.        Functionally complete in comparison with other
> Registry
> Standards
>
> Please review the proposal and let us start discussing it over the mail
> list.
>
> thanks,
> Sanjay Patil
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
> IONA
> Total Business Integration (TM)
> Phone: 408 350 9619                                 http://www.iona.com
>
> (See attached file: SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Name: SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc
>    SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc    Type: WINWORD File (application/msword)
>                                       Encoding: BASE64

--
Regards,
Farrukh

begin:vcard 
n:Najmi;Farrukh
tel;work:781-442-0703
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.sun.com
org:Sun Microsystems;Java Software
adr:;;1 Network Dr. MS BUR02-302;Burlington;MA;01803-0902;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:najmi@east.sun.com
fn:Farrukh Najmi
end:vcard