Re: Datatype and identity constraints proposal of the day (17 May)

[Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsuke.kawaguchi@eng.sun.com>]

> I think Kawaguchi-san already understands.  What he is asking is this:
> if a RELAX NG pattern references to the NOTATION type of XML Schema, 
> what will happen?  Never matched?  (This is fine to me.)  Or, do we 
> introduce "notation" declarations?  (No!)

I've once learned that fact but I forgot it when I wrote my original
post.

Actually, NOTATION type of XSD is harmless because NOTATION must be
accompanied wit enumeration facet. It's just that those enumerations
must be adequately declared by <xs:notation/>.

That means all we have to do is skip that check and allow any value as
an enumeration.

So I was wrong.

If any, the only issue that the TC should consider is whether any other
datatype vocabulary wants to use notation declarations of DTD.


regards,
----------------------
K.Kawaguchi
E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com