[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [saf] CASCON workshop
Hi Mary, I have read the new process and FAQ. All I am saying is that the
new process came into effect too late for us to prepare and approve a public
review draft for the CASCON workshop. Thanks, Stavros From: Mary McRae
[mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Hi Stavros, The Board Process
Committee - of which Paul Lipton is a part - set the policy for Non Standards
Track Work Products, which includes presentations. You can give a presentation
on your own behalf or your company's behalf, but it cannot be presented with
the perspective of you stating that you're representing the views of the
committee without first having reached Committee Note status. I urge you to review
the new TC Process and the FAQ, where this question is answered. "10. If a TC is preparing a
slide presentation for a public event, does the presentation really have to be
classified and approved as a Non-Standards Work Product, including the
requirements to list all contributors, have a statement about patents on every
slide, require public review, etc.? Of course you could decide that
your presentation should be covered under the patent provisions of the IPR
Policy and approve it under the Standards Track as well. Regards, Mary On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:08 AM,
<Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
<Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
wrote:
Hi Mary, Why do we need a Committee
Note and not just a Committee Draft in order to present?? All TC material are
public anyway, so a simple CD would be enough I would have thought. In any case, this is now
impossible since the CASCON workshop is in less than 2 weeks time! The previous
OASIS process only had a Committee Draft and did not distinguish between Notes
and Specifications, thus not really enabling us to approve any slidedecks as
Committee Specification –this would just be absurd! So now with the new
process, Committee Notes were introduced, which are suitable for this purpose,
but now there is no time to implement this process. Regards, Stavros From: Mary McRae
[mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Just a reminder that now that
slidedeck will need to be approved as a Committee Note Draft and submitted for
a 30-day public review before being approved as a Committee Note and presented. Regards, Mary Mary P McRae Director, Standards Development Technical Committee
Administrator Member Section Administrator OASIS: Advancing open
standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org phone: 1.603.232.9090 Standards are like parachutes:
they work best when they're open. Important Links for all TC
Members: TC Handbook: http://docs.oasis-open.org/TChandbook/ On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:39 AM, <Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>
wrote:
Hi all, Remember when I
said we have a whole hour to discuss SAF in the CASCON workshop? Well, that's
not *entirely* true: we do have a whole hour, but we won't really
discuss it. We have the keynote slot. This is a good
chance for promoting SAF but makes discussions and feedback a bit trickier, and
I will have to socialize a lot afterwards! In any case, next week I will start
discussions about the presentation and content, although it will of course be
based on our educational slidedeck. Cheers, Stavros
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]